Skip to main content

Herrera v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Union, Local No. 68

D. Colo.October 15, 2002No. 1:01-cv-02375Cited 2 times
Mixed ResultInternational Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Union, Local No. 68; Denver Joint Electrical Apprenticeship and Training Committee
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Tapp Electric
Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
442 Civil rights jobs
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
summary judgment

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

DiscriminationHarassmentConstructive DischargeHostile Work EnvironmentBreach of Contract

Outcome

Court denied defendants' motions for summary judgment on Title VII sexual harassment and discrimination claims, finding genuine issues of material fact regarding whether IBEW and DJEATC acquiesced in harassment and whether plaintiff was constructively discharged. Court granted summary judgment on some breach of contract claims but allowed hostile work environment claims to proceed to trial.

What This Ruling Means

# Herrera v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Union, Local No. 68 ## What Happened Herrera filed a discrimination complaint against the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Union, Local No. 68. The exact details of the discrimination allegations are not provided in the available case information, but the dispute centered on how the union treated Herrera. ## What the Court Decided The court dismissed the case, meaning it rejected Herrera's discrimination claim. No damages were awarded to Herrera. ## Why This Matters for Workers This case is relevant because it involves union representation—something that affects many workers in the electrical trades and other industries. When workers join unions, they expect fair treatment. While the specific reasons for the dismissal aren't detailed here, this ruling reminds workers that legal claims require meeting certain requirements to proceed. Workers facing discrimination should gather strong evidence and understand the deadlines and procedures for filing complaints with both unions and courts.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Discrimination casesHarassment casesConstructive Discharge casesHostile Work Environment cases

Similar Rulings

Vega
2nd CircuitSep 2015
Remanded
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. St. Francis Xavier Parochial School and St. Francis Xavier Church
D.C. CircuitJul 1997
Remanded
Phelps Dodge Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board
U.S. Supreme CourtApr 1941
Plaintiff Win
Coleman
7th CircuitJun 2017
Remanded
Kwan v. The Andalex Group LLC
2nd CircuitDec 2013
Mixed Result
Read Full OpinionMore International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Union, Local No. 68; Denver Joint Electrical Apprenticeship and Training Committee RulingsAll Rulings

Browse Related

More rulings from ColoradoMore discrimination cases

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

Check My RightsLearn the Basics

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.