Skip to main content

Operative Plasterers' & Cement Masons' International Ass'n of the United States & Canada v. Jordan Interiors, Inc.

D.D.C.September 22, 2010No. Civil Action 09-1160 (RBW), 09-2212 (RBW)Cited 4 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Reggie B. Walton
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
summary judgment

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

Court granted summary judgment in part for the Association on Arbitrator Greenberg's award (affirmed) and in part for the Brotherhood of Carpenters/Southwest Regional Council on Arbitrator Kelly's award (vacated). Association awarded attorney fees and court costs related to the Greenberg award enforcement.

What This Ruling Means

**Union vs. Construction Company: Court Upholds Some Worker Rights** This case involved a dispute between construction unions and Jordan Interiors, Inc., a construction company. The unions had won two separate arbitration awards against the company - one from Arbitrator Greenberg and another from Arbitrator Kelly. When Jordan Interiors refused to follow these arbitration decisions, the unions went to court to force the company to comply. The court made a split decision. It ruled that Jordan Interiors must follow Arbitrator Greenberg's award and ordered the company to pay the union's attorney fees and court costs for enforcing that decision. However, the court threw out Arbitrator Kelly's award, meaning the company didn't have to follow that one. **What This Means for Workers:** This ruling shows that courts will generally enforce arbitration awards that favor workers and unions, but not always. When employers refuse to follow valid arbitration decisions, workers can successfully take them to court. The fact that the union received attorney fees sends a strong message that employers who ignore arbitration awards may face additional financial penalties. However, the mixed outcome also demonstrates that not all arbitration awards will survive court review.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.