Skip to main content

Padilla v. Manlapaz

E.D.N.Y.August 4, 2009No. 1:07-cv-04866Cited 22 times
Plaintiff WinBarrio Fiesta
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Citation
643 F. Supp. 2d 302, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 75186, 2009 WL 2500726
Judge(s)
Reyes
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
summary judgment

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage TheftWrongful Termination

Outcome

The court granted plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment on all New York state wage claims, finding defendants failed to maintain adequate employment records and violated minimum wage, overtime, spread of hours, and wage deduction laws.

What This Ruling Means

**Padilla v. Manlapaz: Court Rules Against Restaurant for Wage Violations** This case involved a worker who sued Barrio Fiesta restaurant for not paying proper wages and wrongfully firing them. The employee claimed the restaurant violated wage laws and terminated them illegally. The court sided with the worker on all wage-related claims. The judge found that Barrio Fiesta failed to keep proper employment records as required by New York law. The restaurant also violated multiple wage requirements: they didn't pay minimum wage, failed to pay overtime when required, didn't compensate for "spread of hours" (when work shifts are spread over many hours in a day), and made illegal deductions from paychecks. The court granted partial summary judgment, meaning these violations were so clear that no trial was needed to prove them. **What this means for workers:** Employers must follow strict rules about wages and record-keeping. If your employer doesn't maintain proper time records, pays below minimum wage, skips overtime pay, or makes unauthorized deductions, you may have grounds for a lawsuit. This ruling shows courts will hold employers accountable for basic wage law violations, even when employers fail to keep adequate records.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.