The trial court dismissed plaintiff's appeal from an arbitration award because she failed to participate in good faith in the arbitration proceedings, and the appellate court affirmed the dismissal.
Romer-Pollis v. Ada County: Worker Loses Case for Not Participating in Required Arbitration
What Happened
An employee named Romer-Pollis had a workplace dispute with Ada County that involved employment law claims related to the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Instead of going directly to court, the case went to arbitration—a process where a neutral third party resolves disputes outside of traditional court proceedings. However, Romer-Pollis failed to participate properly in the arbitration process, which the court determined showed she was not acting in good faith.
What the Court Decided
The arbitration panel ruled against Romer-Pollis, and when she tried to appeal that decision to the regular court system, both the trial court and appellate court dismissed her appeal. The courts found that because she didn't participate meaningfully in the arbitration proceedings, she couldn't challenge the outcome later.
Why This Matters for Workers
This case highlights an important lesson: if your employment contract requires arbitration, you must take the process seriously and participate fully. Even if you disagree with arbitration or prefer going to court, failing to engage properly can cost you the right to challenge an unfavorable decision. Workers should understand their dispute resolution procedures and participate actively in required processes.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Disability, Ohio Civil Rights Act, Americans with Disabilities Act, Americans with Disabilities Act Amendments Act, Ohio Civil Rights Commission, substantially limits, physical impairment, constructive discharge, R.C. Chapter 4112, R.C. 4112.06(E), R.C. 4112.08, R.C. 4112.02(A), Adm. Code…
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.