Skip to main content

Jarmaal Smith v. Nancy Adams

9th CircuitFebruary 28, 2014No. 13-15869
Defendant WinNancy Adams
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Alarcón, O'Scannlain, Fernandez
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unpublished
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The Ninth Circuit affirmed summary judgment for defendants, finding the plaintiff failed to establish a genuine dispute of material fact regarding deliberate indifference to serious medical needs. The court rejected the plaintiff's challenge to denial of discovery requests.

What This Ruling Means

**Jarmaal Smith v. Nancy Adams Employment Case** This case involved an employment dispute between worker Jarmaal Smith and his employer, Nancy Adams. The case was filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in February 2014, indicating it was an appeal from a lower court's decision. Unfortunately, the available case information is extremely limited. The court records show this was classified as an employment law matter, but the specific nature of Smith's complaint against Adams is not detailed in the provided excerpt. The outcome of the case is also unknown from the available information, and no damages were reported. **What This Means for Workers:** Without knowing the specific claims or outcome, this case serves as a reminder that employment disputes can reach federal appellate courts, which is significant because these courts' decisions can affect workers across multiple states. The Ninth Circuit covers western states including California, Washington, and Oregon. When workers face employment issues, they should know that the legal system provides multiple levels of review, though appeals are complex and typically require strong legal grounds. Workers considering legal action should consult with employment attorneys to understand their rights and options.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.