Skip to main content

Commissioner of Labor Ex Rel. Lemelany S. Murphy v. Shree Ji Bava, LLC, d/b/a Comfort Inn South

Ind. Ct. App.April 8, 2013No. 49A04-1205-PL-275
Mixed ResultShree Ji Bava, LLC$10,337 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unpublished
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage Theft

Outcome

The appellate court reversed and remanded in part and dismissed in part, finding that the Commissioner of Labor was the proper plaintiff, that the trial court lacked authority to terminate proceedings supplemental based on a settlement agreement of unclear validity, and that tortious interference claims were not properly before the court.

What This Ruling Means

**Hotel Workers' Wage Dispute Goes to Appeals Court** This case involved a dispute between the Labor Commissioner and Shree Ji Bava, LLC, which operates a Comfort Inn South hotel. The Labor Commissioner took action against the hotel on behalf of an employee named Lemelany S. Murphy over wage and employment practices. While the specific details of what wage violations occurred aren't provided, these cases typically involve issues like unpaid wages, overtime violations, or other labor law breaches. The case went to an appeals court, meaning either the employer or the Labor Commissioner disagreed with a lower court's decision and asked a higher court to review it. Unfortunately, the final outcome of this appeal isn't specified in the available information. **What This Means for Workers:** This case demonstrates that state labor commissioners actively investigate and pursue wage violations on behalf of workers, even taking cases to higher courts when necessary. Hotel and hospitality workers, who are often vulnerable to wage theft, can file complaints with their state's labor department when employers fail to pay proper wages. Even if you don't have resources for a private attorney, government agencies may pursue your case and fight for your rights through the court system.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Wage Theft cases

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.