Skip to main content

Union Square Federal Credit Union v. Richard R. Clay

Tex. App.—2nd Dist.April 30, 2009No. 02-07-00167-CV
Defendant WinRichard R. Clay
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wrongful Termination

Outcome

The appeal was dismissed as frivolous and the trial court's judgment was affirmed.

What This Ruling Means

I apologize, but I cannot provide a meaningful summary of this case based on the information provided. The excerpt you've shared appears to be incomplete - it only shows basic case details (parties, court, filing date) but doesn't include any content about what actually happened in the dispute, what legal issues were involved, or how the court ruled. To write an accurate plain-English summary for workers, I would need access to: - The actual court opinion or ruling text - Details about the employment dispute between the parties - The specific legal claims that were made - How the court decided those claims - The reasoning behind the court's decision The case information shows it involved Union Square Federal Credit Union and Richard R. Clay in what appears to be an employment law matter, but without the substantive content of the ruling, I cannot explain what happened, what the court decided, or what it means for workers. If you can provide the actual court opinion or more detailed case information, I'd be happy to create the plain-English summary you requested.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

More Rulings in This Case

Other orders and opinions in Union Square Federal Credit Union v. Richard R. Clay from the same court.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.