Skip to main content

Matter of Tango (Commr. of Labor)

N.Y. App. Div.September 17, 2015No. 520684
Defendant Win
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The Appellate Division affirmed the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board's decision denying claimant Mary Ann Tango's application for reopening and reconsideration of a prior decision.

What This Ruling Means

**Employment Case Summary: Matter of Tango** This case involved a dispute between a worker named Tango and the New York State Commissioner of Labor. While the court document doesn't provide specific details about what triggered the disagreement, it appears Tango challenged a decision made by the state labor department that affected their employment rights or benefits. **The Court's Decision:** The New York Appellate Division dismissed Tango's case in September 2015. This means the court rejected Tango's challenge and upheld whatever decision the Commissioner of Labor had originally made. No damages were awarded to either party. **What This Means for Workers:** This case serves as a reminder that challenging state labor department decisions can be difficult. When workers disagree with rulings from agencies like the Department of Labor, they have the right to appeal through the court system. However, this case shows that courts often defer to the expertise of labor officials unless there's clear evidence of wrongdoing or legal error. Workers considering similar appeals should understand that success isn't guaranteed and may want to consult with employment attorneys to evaluate the strength of their cases before proceeding.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.