Skip to main content

Kersch Ray v. Eric Swager

Mich. Ct. App.October 15, 2015No. 322766
Defendant WinChelsea High School
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unpublished
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The appellate court reversed the trial court's denial of the governmental employee's motion for summary disposition, finding that the employee was entitled to governmental immunity under MCL 691.1407(2) because his conduct was not the proximate cause of the student's injuries.

What This Ruling Means

**Kersch Ray v. Eric Swager: Government Employee Protected from Negligence Lawsuit** This case involved a lawsuit against Eric Swager, a government employee at Chelsea High School, where a student was injured. The student (represented by Kersch Ray) sued Swager for negligence, claiming he was responsible for the injuries that occurred. The trial court initially allowed the lawsuit to proceed against the school employee. However, the appellate court reversed this decision and ruled in favor of Swager. The higher court found that Swager was protected by governmental immunity laws because his actions were not the direct cause of the student's injuries. Under Michigan law, government employees are generally protected from personal lawsuits when performing their job duties, unless their conduct directly caused the harm. This ruling matters for workers because it reinforces important legal protections for government employees. If you work for a school, city, county, or state government, you're typically protected from being personally sued for actions taken as part of your job duties. However, this protection isn't absolute – if your conduct directly causes someone's injury, you could still face personal liability. This case shows courts will carefully examine whether an employee's actions actually caused the harm before removing these protections.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

More Rulings in This Case

Other orders and opinions in Kersch Ray v. Eric Swager from the same court.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.