Astorga v. Retirement Bd. of the Santa Barbara Employees Retirement System CA2/6
Case Details
- Judge(s)
- Perren
- Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
- Unpublished
- Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
- appeal
- State
- California
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Outcome
The Court of Appeal affirmed the trial court's denial of Astorga's writ of mandate challenging the Retirement Board's calculation of her disability retirement effective date. The Board correctly determined that her retirement was effective the day after she received her last payment of sick leave, vacation, and holiday pay (December 9, 2013), not an earlier date based on hypothetically compressed leave payments.
What This Ruling Means
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Similar Rulings
Browse Related
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.