Skip to main content

Singer v. Uaw Local Union 1112, Unpublished Decision (4-30-2002)

Ohio Ct. App.April 30, 2002No. Accelerated Case No. 2001-T-0028.
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
FORD, P.J.
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unpublished
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
motion to dismiss

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

DiscriminationRetaliationHostile Work EnvironmentHarassment

Outcome

The trial court properly dismissed all six causes of action against UAW Local Union 1112 and Robert Monoski for failure to state a claim. The appellate court affirmed, finding that plaintiff failed to allege facts supporting race/sex discrimination violations, public policy violations, civil conspiracy, intentional/negligent infliction of emotional distress, or breach of the union's duty of fair representation.

What This Ruling Means

**Singer v. UAW Local Union 1112: Court Dismisses Worker's Claims Against Union** This case involved a worker named Singer who sued UAW Local Union 1112 and union official Robert Monoski. Singer claimed the union discriminated against him based on race and sex, retaliated against him, created a hostile work environment, and failed to represent him fairly. He also alleged harassment and that the union violated public policy. The court dismissed all of Singer's claims, ruling that he failed to provide enough specific facts to support any of his accusations. Both the original trial court and the appeals court agreed that Singer's lawsuit didn't contain sufficient details to prove discrimination, retaliation, harassment, or that the union breached its duty to represent him fairly. **What This Means for Workers:** This case highlights how important it is to have specific, detailed evidence when filing discrimination or harassment claims against a union. Workers can't rely on general accusations - they must provide concrete facts showing exactly how they were wronged. If you believe your union has discriminated against you or failed to represent you properly, document specific incidents with dates, witnesses, and clear examples of unfair treatment before pursuing legal action.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.