Skip to main content

Miasia Barron, and Maddison Schmidt, Plaintiff/Respondent v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc.

Mo. Ct. App.November 8, 2016No. ED103508
Plaintiff WinAbbott Laboratories, Inc.$38,000,000 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J.
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
jury verdict

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

Jury verdict awarded plaintiff $15,000,000 in actual damages and $23,000,000 in punitive damages for birth defects caused by maternal ingestion of Depakote during pregnancy. Appellate court affirmed the trial court's judgment.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened:** Miasia Barron and Maddison Schmidt sued Abbott Laboratories over birth defects they claimed were caused by the drug Depakote. The mothers had taken this seizure medication during pregnancy, and their children were born with serious birth defects. The plaintiffs argued that Abbott knew about the risks but failed to adequately warn doctors and patients about the dangers of taking Depakote while pregnant. **What the Court Decided:** A jury found Abbott liable and awarded $38 million in damages - $15 million to cover actual costs like medical expenses and $23 million in punitive damages to punish the company. The court ruled that Abbott was guilty of strict liability, negligence, failure to warn patients, fraud, and breach of warranty. When Abbott appealed, a higher court upheld the original decision. **Why This Matters for Workers:** This case shows that companies can be held responsible when they fail to properly warn employees and consumers about workplace or product dangers. Workers have legal protections when employers or manufacturers hide known risks that could cause serious harm. The large punitive damages send a message that courts will impose significant financial penalties on companies that prioritize profits over safety.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.