Skip to main content

Documation Inc. v. Nlrb

11th CircuitMarch 8, 1984No. 82-5984
Defendant WinDocumation Inc.
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal
State
Florida

Related Laws

Claim Types

Retaliation

Outcome

The Eleventh Circuit affirmed the NLRB's decision, rejecting Documation Inc.'s challenge to the Board's ruling on the underlying labor dispute.

What This Ruling Means

**Documation Inc. v. NLRB (1984)** This case involved a dispute between Documation Inc., a company, and the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), the federal agency that enforces workers' rights to organize and bargain collectively. The NLRB had made a ruling against Documation Inc., likely finding that the company violated workers' rights under the National Labor Relations Act. Documation challenged this decision in federal court. The Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals sided with the NLRB and upheld the labor board's original decision against the company. This meant the court agreed that Documation had violated federal labor law and that the NLRB's ruling was correct. This decision matters for workers because it reinforces that federal courts will back up the NLRB when companies try to challenge labor board rulings in court. When the NLRB finds that an employer has violated workers' rights to organize, join unions, or engage in collective bargaining, companies cannot easily overturn these decisions by appealing to federal courts. This helps ensure that workers' fundamental labor rights remain protected and that employers face consequences when they break federal labor laws.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Retaliation cases

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.