Saluja v. Advance America Cash Advance Centers of Nevada, Inc.
Case Details
- Judge(s)
- Fernandez, Watford, Staton
- Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
- Unpublished
- Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
- appeal
- Circuit
- Ninth Circuit
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
Outcome
The appeals court affirmed the district court's dismissal of plaintiff's discrimination complaint because it was filed with the EEOC more than two years after termination, exceeding the 300-day statute of limitations, and plaintiff was not entitled to equitable tolling.
Similar Rulings
Browse Related
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.