Skip to main content

Massasoit Industrial Corp. v. Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination

Mass. App. Ct.March 23, 2017No. AC 16-P-459
Plaintiff WinMassasoit Industrial Corporation$141,650 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

DiscriminationWrongful Termination

Outcome

The Appeals Court affirmed the Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination's decision that Massasoit Industrial Corporation unlawfully terminated William J. Glynn based on age and disability discrimination, upholding damages awards of $55,650 in lost income and $35,000 for emotional distress, plus over $51,000 in attorney's fees.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened:** Massasoit Industrial Corp., a Massachusetts company, was involved in a discrimination case that went before the Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination (MCAD). The company appealed the commission's decision, bringing the case to the appeals court. While the specific details of the discrimination claims aren't provided in the available information, this appears to be a workplace discrimination dispute where an employee or employees filed complaints against the company. **What the Court Decided:** The court ruling's specific outcome isn't detailed in the available information. However, this case represents part of the appeals process where employers can challenge decisions made by the state's anti-discrimination agency. **Why This Matters for Workers:** This case illustrates an important aspect of Massachusetts employment law - workers have access to the MCAD to file discrimination complaints against their employers. Even when companies appeal these decisions, the legal process provides multiple levels of review to ensure fair treatment. Workers should know they can file discrimination complaints with state agencies, and that these agencies have real authority to investigate and make decisions about workplace discrimination. The appeals process, while sometimes lengthy, helps ensure that both workers' rights and proper legal procedures are protected.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.