Skip to main content

Suzanne Bishop West v. Epiphany Salon & Day Spa, LLC

Tenn. Ct. App.April 25, 2017No. E2016-01860-COA-R3-CV
Defendant WinEpiphany Salon & Day Spa, LLC$47,800 at issue
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Judge D. Michael Swiney
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal from trial court judgment; appellate affirmance

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

Appellate court affirmed trial court's reduction of jury damages award from $125,000 to $47,800 in negligence case involving facial burn injury at salon, finding no reversible error in remittitur.

Excerpt

This appeal concerns a jury award of damages in a negligence case. Suzanne Bishop West ("West") sued Epiphany Salon & Day Spa, LLC ("Epiphany") in the Circuit Court for Hamilton County ("the Trial Court") for damages resulting from a facial she received that burned her face. Epiphany conceded liability and the matter went before a jury for a determination of damages. The jury awarded West $125,000 in damages. Epiphany filed a motion for remittitur. The Trial Court, finding the award excessive, reduced the award from $125,000 to $47,800. West appeals to this Court, asking that we restore the original jury award of $125,000. Finding no reversible error, we affirm the judgment of the Trial Court.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened** Suzanne Bishop West received a facial treatment at Epiphany Salon & Day Spa that severely burned her face. She sued the salon for negligence, and the salon admitted they were at fault. The case went to a jury to decide how much money West should receive for her injuries. The jury awarded her $125,000 in damages. **What the Court Decided** The salon asked the trial court to reduce the jury's award, claiming it was too high. The trial court agreed and cut the damages from $125,000 to $47,800. West appealed this reduction, but the appellate court upheld the lower amount, ruling that the trial court was within its rights to reduce what it considered an excessive award. **Why This Matters for Workers** This case shows that even when businesses admit fault for injuring customers or employees, courts can limit how much compensation victims receive. While the woman won her case and received nearly $48,000, the courts determined that the jury's original award was too generous. This demonstrates that damage awards aren't guaranteed to stick, even after a jury decides in your favor.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.