Skip to main content

Sage Redwind v. Western Union, LLC

9th CircuitOctober 3, 2017No. 16-35563Cited 4 times
Defendant WinWestern Union, LLC
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Silverman, Tallman, Smith
Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
3442 Jobs
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unpublished
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

DiscriminationHarassmentRetaliation

Outcome

The Ninth Circuit affirmed the district court's summary judgment in favor of Western Union, finding that the plaintiff failed to establish prima facie cases of discrimination, harassment, and retaliation under Title VII, and that some claims were barred by the statute of limitations.

What This Ruling Means

**Sage Redwind v. Western Union, LLC** Sage Redwind, a former Western Union employee, sued the company claiming workplace discrimination, harassment, retaliation, and defamation. Redwind alleged that Western Union treated her unfairly because of her protected characteristics and then retaliated against her for complaining about the treatment. The court ruled in favor of Western Union on all claims. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals found that Redwind could not prove the basic elements needed to win her discrimination, harassment, and retaliation cases under federal employment law (Title VII). Additionally, the court determined that some of her claims were filed too late, missing important legal deadlines for bringing such cases to court. **What This Means for Workers:** This case highlights how challenging it can be to win employment discrimination lawsuits. Workers must be able to prove specific elements of their claims and act quickly when filing complaints. The ruling emphasizes the importance of documenting workplace incidents, understanding filing deadlines, and building a strong case with clear evidence of discrimination or retaliation. Workers facing similar situations should consult with employment attorneys early to understand their rights and ensure they meet all legal requirements for pursuing their claims.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.