Skip to main content

Johnson v. Service Employees International Union Local 1107

9th CircuitOctober 17, 2017No. 16-15795
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
O'Scannlain, Tashima, Bybee
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unpublished
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Discrimination

Outcome

The Ninth Circuit affirmed the district court's grant of summary judgment for Service Employees International Union Local 1107, finding that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case of racial discrimination and failed to present evidence of pretext regarding her termination and reassignment.

What This Ruling Means

**Johnson v. Service Employees International Union Local 1107 - Court Ruling Summary** **What Happened:** This case involved a dispute between an employee named Johnson and the Service Employees International Union Local 1107. The case was filed in 2017 and dealt with employment law issues, though the specific details of the workplace conflict are not available from the court records provided. **What the Court Decided:** Unfortunately, the outcome of this case cannot be determined from the available information. The case was heard by the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, but the court's final decision and reasoning are not included in the provided documentation. **What This Means for Workers:** Without knowing the specific outcome, it's difficult to draw concrete lessons for workers from this case. However, the fact that this dispute involved a union (Service Employees International Union Local 1107) suggests it may have dealt with important workplace rights or union-related employment issues. Workers should be aware that employment disputes can arise even within union organizations, and that the court system provides a avenue for resolving such conflicts when other methods fail. *Note: This summary is limited by incomplete case information.*

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.