Skip to main content

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Butler

Md.October 23, 2017No. 14ag/16Cited 6 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Barbera, Greene, Adkins, McDonald, Watts, Hotten, Getty
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

Attorney Lance Butler III was disbarred for violations of Maryland Lawyers' Rules of Professional Conduct 3.3 and 8.4 stemming from falsifying tax forms, misrepresenting his employment and finances to his federal employer, and lying under oath in prior disciplinary proceedings.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened** This case involved Attorney Lance Butler III, who worked for the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). Butler was accused of serious misconduct including falsifying tax documents, lying to his federal employer about his job status and financial situation, and providing false testimony under oath during earlier disciplinary hearings. **What the Court Decided** The Maryland Attorney Grievance Commission successfully proved that Butler violated professional conduct rules that require lawyers to be honest with courts and maintain integrity in their profession. As a result, Butler was disbarred, meaning he permanently lost his license to practice law in Maryland. **Why This Matters for Workers** This case demonstrates that employees in professional positions face serious consequences for dishonesty, especially when it involves legal or financial matters. Workers should understand that falsifying documents or lying to employers about employment status or finances can result in losing professional licenses and career-ending penalties. The case shows that professional licensing boards take integrity violations seriously, particularly when they involve federal employment. For workers in licensed professions, maintaining honesty in all professional dealings is essential to protecting their careers and livelihoods.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

More Rulings in This Case

Other orders and opinions in Attorney Grievance Commission v. Butler from the same court.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.