Skip to main content

Ronald Fleshman, Jr. v. Volkswagen, Ag

9th CircuitJuly 3, 2018No. 16-17060Cited 15 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The Ninth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Ronald Fleshman's motion to intervene in the federal government's Clean Air Act enforcement action against Volkswagen. Fleshman, a Volkswagen owner, lacked statutory right to intervene under the Clean Air Act's citizen suit provision and lacked standing under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 24(a)(2).

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened** Ronald Fleshman Jr. owned a Volkswagen vehicle and wanted to join a federal government lawsuit against Volkswagen AG. The government was suing Volkswagen for violating the Clean Air Act (this was likely related to the emissions scandal where Volkswagen installed software to cheat on pollution tests). Fleshman tried to intervene in the case, meaning he wanted to become a party to the lawsuit alongside the government. **What the Court Decided** The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled against Fleshman. The court said he had no legal right to join the government's environmental lawsuit. Under the Clean Air Act's rules for citizen lawsuits and federal court procedures, Fleshman couldn't prove he had the legal standing necessary to become part of the case. The court upheld a lower court's decision to deny his request to intervene. **Why This Matters for Workers** This case shows the limits of when individuals can join existing lawsuits against employers. Even when a company faces federal enforcement action, affected individuals (whether employees, customers, or others) cannot automatically join those proceedings. Workers facing similar situations would typically need to file separate lawsuits or find other legal remedies rather than trying to attach themselves to government enforcement cases.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.