Skip to main content

State of Delaware v. Adam C. Lecates

DELCTCOMPLAugust 22, 2018No. 1801011067
Defendant WinAdam C. Lecates
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Smalls C.J.
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
motion to dismiss

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The court granted the defendant's motion to suppress, finding that the officer lacked reasonable articulable suspicion to stop the vehicle because it was factually impossible for the defendant to comply with the 300-foot signaling requirement given the road configuration with parked vehicles.

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.