Skip to main content

Parada Torres v. Unite Here Local 25

D.D.C.April 3, 2019No. Civil Action No. 2018-0755
Defendant WinUnite Here Local 25
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Judge Amit P. Mehta
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
summary judgment

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

DiscriminationRetaliation

Outcome

The court granted defendant union's motion for summary judgment, finding plaintiff failed to produce evidence that the union's decision not to represent him in mediation was discriminatory rather than based on legitimate, non-discriminatory reasons including his prior disciplinary history and evidence he initiated the altercation.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.