Skip to main content

Parada Torres v. Unite Here Local 25

D.D.C.April 3, 2019No. Civil Action No. 2018-0755
Defendant WinUnite Here Local 25
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Judge Amit P. Mehta
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
summary judgment

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

DiscriminationRetaliation

Outcome

The court granted defendant union's motion for summary judgment, finding plaintiff failed to produce evidence that the union's decision not to represent him in mediation was discriminatory rather than based on legitimate, non-discriminatory reasons including his prior disciplinary history and evidence he initiated the altercation.

What This Ruling Means

**Parada Torres v. Unite Here Local 25: Employment Dispute** This case involved a dispute between Parada Torres and Unite Here Local 25, a labor union, filed in federal court in Washington D.C. in April 2019. The case centered on employment law issues, though the specific details of what Torres alleged against the union are not clear from the available information. Unfortunately, the court's decision in this case is not known from the provided records. The case was filed but the outcome - whether Torres won, lost, or the parties reached a settlement - has not been determined from the available documents. No damages were reported, which could mean either no money was awarded or the case ended without a monetary judgment. **What This Means for Workers:** Without knowing the specific claims or outcome, it's difficult to draw clear lessons from this case. However, it demonstrates that workers can bring employment law claims against labor unions, not just traditional employers. Workers have legal rights that must be respected by all types of organizations they work for or with, including unions that are supposed to represent workers' interests. If you have employment law concerns, whether with a traditional employer or a union, you may have legal options available.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.