Matthew Carello v. Aurora Policeman Credit Union
Case Details
- Judge(s)
- Barrett
- Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
- Published
- Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
- appeal
- Circuit
- Seventh Circuit
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
Outcome
The court affirmed the district court's dismissal of Carello's ADA claim, holding that he lacked standing to sue because he failed to allege a concrete and particularized injury in fact, as he was legally barred from using the credit union's services under Illinois law.
More Rulings in This Case
Other orders and opinions in Matthew Carello v. Aurora Policeman Credit Union from the same court.
Similar Rulings
Browse Related
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.