Skip to main content

Twenty Holdings, LLC v. Land South TN, LLC and Brandon Majors

Tenn. Ct. App.September 5, 2019No. M2018-01903-COA-R3-CV
Plaintiff WinLand South TN, LLC$185,000 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Presiding Judge J. Steven Stafford
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
jury verdict; appellate affirmance

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

Plaintiff recovered $185,000 in damages for negligence after a jury trial. The trial court granted defendants' motion for directed verdict on gross negligence, recklessness, trespass, negligent hiring, negligent entrustment, and punitive damages claims. The appellate court affirmed the judgment.

Excerpt

Plaintiff sued defendant-company and its employee for damages to its real property when the defendant-company's tractor-trailer collided with the plaintiff's residential properties while the truck was unmanned. The plaintiff raised claims of negligence, gross negligence, recklessness, trespass, negligent hiring, negligent entrustment, and punitive damages. A jury trial occurred, and the trial court granted the defendants' motion for a directed verdict as to all but the plaintiff's negligence claim. The jury later awarded the plaintiff $185,000.00 for the diminution in value to the real property. Both parties appealed. Discerning no reversible error, we affirm.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened:** A trucking company employee left his tractor-trailer unmanned, and it rolled into and damaged residential properties owned by Twenty Holdings, LLC. The property owner sued both the trucking company (Land South TN, LLC) and the employee (Brandon Majors) for the damage. They claimed the company was negligent, hired the wrong person, and acted recklessly by letting an unqualified driver operate their truck. **What the Court Decided:** A jury found the trucking company liable for basic negligence and awarded $185,000 in damages to the property owner. However, the court dismissed the more serious claims like gross negligence, reckless behavior, and negligent hiring. The appeals court upheld this decision, confirming that the company had to pay for the damage caused by their employee's actions. **Why This Matters for Workers:** This case shows that employers are legally responsible for their employees' actions while working, even when the employee makes a mistake. However, it also demonstrates that courts distinguish between simple workplace errors and more serious misconduct. Workers should understand that their employers will typically be held liable for damages they cause during work, but the level of responsibility depends on the severity of the incident.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.