Skip to main content

Hiss v. Perkins Local School Dist. Bd. of Edn.

Ohio Ct. App.September 13, 2019No. E-18-034Cited 8 times
Defendant WinPerkins Local School District Board of Education
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Mayle
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal
State
Ohio

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wrongful Termination

Outcome

The appellate court reversed the trial court's judgment, finding that the school board had good and just cause to terminate the teacher's employment contract for providing prescription medications to students in violation of school policy.

Excerpt

The common pleas court improperly vacated a school board's decision to terminate a teacher's contract because it applied the wrong standard for "good and just cause" in an R.C. 3319.16 termination proceeding, failed to give deference to the referee's credibility determinations, and impermissibly substituted its judgment for the school board's judgment.

What This Ruling Means

Hiss v. Perkins Local School District Board of Education

What Happened
A teacher employed by Perkins Local School District was fired after providing prescription medications to students, violating school policy. The teacher challenged the termination in court, arguing it was wrongful. The trial court initially sided with the teacher and overturned the school board's decision to fire them.

What the Court Decided
The appeals court reversed the trial court's decision. The appellate judges ruled that the school board had legitimate, sufficient reasons to terminate the teacher's employment contract. The court found that the trial court had made mistakes in how it evaluated the case, including not properly respecting the referee's findings about credibility and applying the wrong standard for reviewing the termination.

Why This Matters for Workers
This ruling shows that courts give school boards significant authority to enforce their policies. While employees have the right to challenge terminations, courts are reluctant to overturn an employer's decision unless clear errors in the legal process occurred. Workers should understand that violating established workplace policies—particularly those involving safety—can be grounds for termination that courts will likely uphold.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.