Carlton v. Univ. of NC at Chapel Hill
Case Details
- Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
- Published
- Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
- appeal
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
Outcome
The Court of Appeals affirmed the dismissal of Carlton's contested case hearing before the Office of Administrative Hearings for lack of jurisdiction. Although Carlton was reinstated with back pay through UNC's internal grievance process, the court found that Carlton's subsequent petition seeking review of the implementation of that decision fell outside the OAH's statutory authority.
Excerpt
attorney's fees, State employee grievance
Similar Rulings
Browse Related
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.