Skip to main content

Richard Haynes v. Union Pacific Railroad Company, a Corporation

Tex. App.—1st Dist.January 28, 2020No. 01-18-00181-CV
Plaintiff WinUnion Pacific Railroad Company$1,095,000 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
jury verdict

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wrongful Termination

Outcome

Plaintiff Haynes prevailed on his FELA negligence claim against Union Pacific Railroad. The jury found UP 35% responsible and awarded Haynes $1,095,000 in damages, which was affirmed on appeal with modification for railroad retirement tax offset.

What This Ruling Means

**Railroad Worker's Case Against Union Pacific** Richard Haynes, a worker, filed an employment law case against Union Pacific Railroad Company. Based on the limited information available, this appears to involve a workplace dispute between Haynes and his employer, though the specific details of his complaint are not clear from the court records provided. Unfortunately, the court documents don't contain enough information to determine what the court ultimately decided in this case. The outcome remains unknown, and no damages were reported, which could mean the case was dismissed, settled out of court, or is still pending. **What This Means for Workers:** Without knowing the specific details or outcome of this case, it's difficult to draw clear lessons for workers. However, this case serves as a reminder that employees in the railroad industry, like workers in other sectors, have the right to pursue legal action when they believe their employment rights have been violated. Railroad workers should be aware that employment law protections apply to their industry, and they can seek legal remedies through the court system when workplace disputes arise. Workers considering similar action should consult with employment attorneys to understand their specific rights and options.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

More Rulings in This Case

Other orders and opinions in Richard Haynes v. Union Pacific Railroad Company, a Corporation from the same court.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.