Skip to main content

Maurice Goens v. Adams & Associates, Inc.

9th CircuitAugust 21, 2020No. 18-16750
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unpublished
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

DiscriminationRetaliationHarassmentWrongful TerminationHostile Work Environment

Outcome

The Ninth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of Goens' complaint for failure to state plausible claims under FEHA for discrimination, retaliation, harassment, wrongful termination, failure to prevent discrimination, and intentional infliction of emotional distress.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.