I.U. VS. M.U. (FV-20-1461-19, UNION COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (RECORD IMPOUNDEND)
Case Details
- Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
- Unpublished
- Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
- appeal
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
Outcome
The appellate court affirmed the family court judge's final restraining order (FRO) against the defendant for harassment under the Prevention of Domestic Violence Act, finding sufficient evidence that defendant committed the predicate act of harassment and that the restraining order was necessary to protect plaintiff from future domestic violence.
Similar Rulings
Browse Related
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.