Skip to main content

Pettay v. DeVry Univ., Inc.

Ohio Ct. App.April 20, 2021No. 19AP-762Cited 2 times
Mixed ResultDeVry Univ., Inc
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Brown
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
summary judgment

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Discrimination

Excerpt

Trial court did not err in granting summary judgment in favor of appellees on appellant's age discrimination claim.

What This Ruling Means

# Pettay v. DeVry University Case Summary ## What Happened A worker at DeVry University filed a lawsuit claiming the company treated them unfairly because of their age. The worker believed they were discriminated against based on how old they were. ## What the Court Decided The trial court ruled against the worker before the case went to trial. A higher court (the appeals court) agreed with this decision, finding that the trial judge did not make a mistake in dismissing the age discrimination claim. The worker did not win any money or relief from the court. ## Why This Matters for Workers This case shows that age discrimination lawsuits face a difficult hurdle—workers must present strong evidence that their age was the real reason for unfair treatment. Simply believing discrimination happened isn't enough. Workers pursuing age discrimination claims need concrete proof, such as evidence showing younger employees were treated better or comments about age were made. This ruling reminds workers that these cases require careful documentation and evidence to succeed in court.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.