Skip to main content

Rauch v. Calligan

Ohio Ct. App.June 18, 2021No. 29027
RemandedCalligan
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Tucker
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
trial verdict

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Excerpt

The trial court abused its discretion by omitting an express determination of whether the record comprised probative, reliable and substantial evidence in support of appellee's decision of July 2, 2020. Furthermore, as a matter of law, appellant put the real property identified in a zoning certificate issued by appellee to the purpose of operating a Class II composting facility by taking action to satisfy the associated legal and regulatory requirements. Judgment reversed and remanded.

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.