Skip to main content

Department of Labor & Industries v. Granger

Wash.March 1, 2007No. No. 78139-7Cited 43 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Bridge
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wrongful Termination

Outcome

The Washington Supreme Court affirmed that health care trust fund payments of $2.15 per hour made by Granger's employer should be included in his monthly wage calculation for workers' compensation disability benefits, even though Granger was not currently eligible to receive the trust benefits at the time of his injury.

What This Ruling Means

**What This Case Was About:** A worker named Granger was injured on the job while employed by G.G. Richardson, Inc. When he applied for workers' compensation disability benefits, a dispute arose over how much his monthly wages should be calculated at. The key issue was whether to include the $2.15 per hour that his employer paid into a health care trust fund on his behalf. Even though Granger couldn't access these trust benefits at the time of his injury, the Department of Labor & Industries wanted to count these payments as part of his wages for calculating his disability benefits. **What the Court Decided:** The Washington Supreme Court ruled in favor of including the health care trust fund payments in Granger's wage calculation. The court said that even though he wasn't currently eligible to receive the trust benefits, the $2.15 per hour his employer contributed should still count toward his total compensation. **Why This Matters for Workers:** This decision helps injured workers receive higher workers' compensation benefits. When employers make contributions to health funds or similar benefits on workers' behalf, those payments can now be included when calculating disability benefits, potentially resulting in larger monthly payments during recovery.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.