Schrock v. A.R. Bldg. Co., Inc.
Case Details
- Judge(s)
- Jamison
- Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
- Published
- Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
- appeal
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
Outcome
The trial court granted the employer's motion for judgment on the pleadings, dismissing the employee's promissory estoppel claim. The appellate court affirmed, finding the employee failed to allege a clear and unambiguous promise of continued employment necessary to overcome the at-will employment doctrine.
Excerpt
Trial court did not err in granting appellee/employer's motion for judgment on the pleadings as to appellant/employee's promissory estoppel claim where appellant's amended complaint failed to allege appellee made specific promises of future job security upon which appellant reasonably relied in leaving her former employment and accepting employment with appellee. It is not reasonable to construe vague and indefinite representations regarding appellant's qualifications and ability to succeed in the position as a clear and unambiguous promise of future job security. Judgment affirmed.
What This Ruling Means
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Similar Rulings
Browse Related
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.