Skip to main content

Nlrb v. Goodie Brand Packing Co

2nd CircuitNovember 6, 1987No. 87-4087
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

Claim Types

Retaliation

Outcome

The National Labor Relations Board's decision was enforced by the Second Circuit Court of Appeals, affirming the Board's determination against Goodie Brand Packing Co.

What This Ruling Means

**NLRB v. Goodie Brand Packing Co. (1987)** This case involved Goodie Brand Packing Company, which the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) accused of violating federal labor laws. The NLRB is a government agency that protects workers' rights to organize and form unions. The agency found that Goodie Brand had broken rules designed to protect employees' workplace rights, though the specific violations aren't detailed in the available information. The company apparently disagreed with the NLRB's findings and challenged them in court. However, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals sided with the NLRB and enforced the agency's decision. This meant the court agreed that Goodie Brand had indeed violated labor laws and would have to comply with whatever remedies the NLRB ordered. **What this means for workers:** This ruling reinforces that federal labor laws have teeth. When the NLRB finds that an employer has violated workers' rights, courts will back up those findings if they're legally sound. This gives workers confidence that there are real consequences when employers break labor laws, and that government agencies tasked with protecting worker rights have meaningful enforcement power.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Retaliation cases

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.