Skip to main content

Ducote v. Union Pacific Railroad, 2009-0940 (La. 6/5/09)

La.June 5, 2009No. No. 2009-C-0940Cited 11 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Victory
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The Louisiana Supreme Court denied the writ of certiorari/review, affirming the lower court decisions in favor of Union Pacific Railroad on the employment claims.

What This Ruling Means

**Railroad Worker Loses Employment Case Against Union Pacific** In this Louisiana case, a worker named Ducote filed an employment-related lawsuit against Union Pacific Railroad Company. While the specific details of Ducote's complaint aren't provided in the available information, the case involved workplace issues that led to legal action against the major railroad employer. The Louisiana Supreme Court decided not to review the case, which meant the lower court's decision in favor of Union Pacific Railroad remained final. By denying Ducote's request for review, the state's highest court effectively ended the case with Union Pacific as the winner. No damages were awarded to the worker. This outcome matters for workers because it shows how challenging it can be to successfully pursue employment claims against large corporations, even when cases make it through multiple levels of courts. When state supreme courts decline to review employment cases, it often means workers have exhausted their options in state court. For railroad workers specifically, this case demonstrates that Union Pacific was able to successfully defend against the employment claims brought against them. Workers facing similar workplace issues should understand that employment litigation can be complex and outcomes are never guaranteed, regardless of the size or nature of their employer.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.