Morales v. Factor Surfaces LLC
Case Details
- Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
- Published
- Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
- appeal
- State
- California
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
Outcome
Employee prevailed on unpaid overtime wages and other wage-and-hour claims. Trial court awarded $99,394.16 total damages, including $42,792.00 in unpaid overtime wages. Appellate court affirmed the judgment, rejecting employer's argument that the overtime calculation method was erroneous.
What This Ruling Means
Morales v. Factor Surfaces LLC - Court Summary
What Happened
Morales worked for Factor Surfaces LLC and claimed the company failed to pay him overtime wages he had earned. He also alleged he was wrongfully fired and faced retaliation after raising concerns about his pay.
What the Court Decided
The trial court ruled in Morales's favor, awarding him $99,394.16 in total damages. This included $42,792.00 specifically for unpaid overtime wages. When the employer appealed, the higher court reviewed the case and agreed with the original decision, confirming that the overtime calculation was correct.
Why This Matters for Workers
This case reinforces that employers cannot cheat workers out of overtime pay and then escape consequences through appeals. The court's decision sends a clear message that wage theft—including unpaid overtime—carries real financial penalties for companies. If you believe your employer has underpaid you for overtime work, this ruling shows the courts take these violations seriously and will hold employers accountable for compensation owed.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Similar Rulings
Browse Related
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.