No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Fannie Mae prevailed on summary judgment in plaintiff's FMLA and DC-FMLA interference claim. The court found no genuine dispute of material fact and ruled that Fannie Mae did not interfere with Skrynnikov's medical leave rights; rather, his leave expired and he failed to provide timely medical certifications to extend it.
Skrynnikov v. Federal National Mortgage Association
What Happened
Skrynnikov sued his employer, Fannie Mae, claiming the company failed to accommodate his medical needs and interfered with his right to medical leave under federal and Washington DC family leave laws.
What the Court Decided
The court sided with Fannie Mae. The judge found that the company did not interfere with Skrynnikov's leave rights. Instead, his medical leave time ran out, and he did not submit the required medical paperwork on time to extend it. Because the facts were clear and one-sided, the court dismissed the case without a trial.
Why This Matters for Workers
This ruling shows that employers aren't responsible for keeping medical leave active if employees don't follow proper procedures. Workers need to understand that simply taking leave isn't enough—you must also submit required medical documentation when requested and meet deadlines set by your employer. Failing to provide this paperwork on time can result in losing your leave protections, even if you have a legitimate medical condition.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.