Tezoco v. GE & LO Corp.
Case Details
- Citation
- 2021 NY Slip Op 06463
- Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
- Published
- Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
- appeal
- State
- New York
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
Outcome
Appellate court reversed dismissal and granted plaintiffs' summary judgment motion on wage and hour claims, finding defendants violated New York Labor Law minimum wage, overtime pay, spread-of-hours pay, and Wage Theft Prevention Act provisions. Matter remanded for determination of damages.
What This Ruling Means
Tezoco v. GE & LO Corp. (Burger Hut)
What Happened
Workers at a Burger Hut location filed a lawsuit claiming their employer failed to pay them properly. They alleged the company violated minimum wage laws, didn't pay overtime when required, failed to compensate them for "spread-of-hours" (gaps between work shifts), and violated the state's Wage Theft Prevention Act.
What the Court Decided
New York's appellate court sided with the workers. The court found that the employer had indeed broken multiple wage laws. A lower court had initially dismissed the case, but the appellate court reversed that decision and ruled in favor of the workers. The case now goes back to a lower court to calculate how much money the workers are owed.
Why This Matters for Workers
This ruling strengthens protections for restaurant and fast-food workers in New York. It confirms that employers must follow all wage laws, including paying for gaps between shifts and providing proper overtime pay. Workers who believe they've been underpaid have a stronger legal foundation to pursue claims against their employers.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Similar Rulings
Browse Related
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.