Skip to main content

Price v. New York State & Local Employees' Retirement System

N.Y. App. Div.June 13, 2013
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Spain
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The New York State & Local Employees' Retirement System's denial of petitioner's refund of tier 3 contributions was upheld. The court confirmed that under Retirement and Social Security Law § 645(2), petitioner was ineligible for a refund because he rejoined the system after July 27, 1976, regardless of his subsequent reinstatement to tier 1.

What This Ruling Means

**Price v. New York State & Local Employees' Retirement System - Court Ruling Summary** This case involved a dispute between an employee named Price and the New York State & Local Employees' Retirement System, which manages pension benefits for government workers. While the specific details of what Price was fighting about aren't provided in the available information, this was an employment-related legal matter that went to New York's appellate court level in 2013. Unfortunately, the court's specific decision and reasoning aren't available in the provided case summary, so the exact outcome remains unclear from this information alone. **What This Means for Workers:** Even without knowing the specific outcome, this case highlights an important reality for public employees: workers do have the right to challenge their employers in court when they believe their employment rights have been violated. The fact that this case reached the appellate level shows that employment disputes with government agencies can be pursued through the legal system. Public employees should know they can seek legal remedies when facing workplace issues, whether related to benefits, working conditions, or other employment matters. However, pursuing legal action requires careful consideration and often professional legal guidance.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

More Rulings in This Case

Other orders and opinions in Price from the same court.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.