Skip to main content

Central Laborers' Pension Fund v. Blankfein

N.Y. App. Div.September 17, 2013
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Friedman
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The appellate court affirmed the trial court's denial of the plaintiff shareholders' request for attorneys' fees in their derivative action against Goldman Sachs, holding that shareholders must satisfy the pre-suit demand requirement or plead its futility before they can recover fees under Business Corporation Law § 626(e), even if the litigation achieved a beneficial result.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened:** Shareholders of Goldman Sachs filed a lawsuit on behalf of the company against its executives, claiming the executives had harmed the company. This type of lawsuit is called a "derivative action" because shareholders are suing to protect the company's interests. After the case ended, the shareholders asked the court to order Goldman Sachs to pay their legal fees, arguing their lawsuit had benefited the company. **What the Court Decided:** The court refused to award the shareholders their attorney fees. The judges ruled that before shareholders can recover legal costs in these types of cases, they must first ask the company's board of directors to take action, or explain why asking the board would be pointless. Since the shareholders didn't follow this required step, they couldn't get their legal fees paid, even though their lawsuit may have helped the company. **Why This Matters for Workers:** This ruling primarily affects shareholders rather than employees directly. However, it shows how corporate governance works and the procedures that must be followed when challenging executive decisions. For workers who may own company stock through retirement plans, this demonstrates that shareholder lawsuits have strict rules that can limit when legal costs can be recovered.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.