Skip to main content

National Labor Relations Board v. Regency Grande Nursing & Rehabilitation Center

3rd CircuitFebruary 14, 2012No. 11-2299Cited 1 time
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Sloviter, Vanaskie, Pollak
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unpublished
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Outcome

The Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit enforced the NLRB's Decision and Order finding that Regency Grande violated the National Labor Relations Act by refusing to bargain with the certified union representative 1199 SEIU.

What This Ruling Means

# Regency Grande Nursing & Rehabilitation Center Case Summary **What Happened** Regency Grande Nursing & Rehabilitation Center refused to negotiate with its workers' union representative, 1199 SEIU, even though the union had been officially certified to represent the facility's employees. **What the Court Decided** The Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit sided with the National Labor Relations Board, ruling that Regency Grande broke federal labor law by rejecting union bargaining. The court enforced the board's decision requiring the company to comply. **Why This Matters for Workers** This ruling protects workers' basic right to negotiate together through a union. Once employees choose a union to represent them, employers cannot simply refuse to talk or bargain with that union. The decision reinforces that companies must engage in good-faith negotiations about wages, benefits, and working conditions. Without this protection, employers could ignore workers' collective voice and avoid discussions about improving their jobs.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.