Jean Adams v. Novo Nordisk A/S

9th CircuitMarch 28, 2022No. 21-55342

Defendant WinNovo Nordisk A/S

Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling: Unpublished
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached: appeal
Circuit: Ninth Circuit

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Failure to Accommodate

Outcome

The Ninth Circuit affirmed summary judgment for Novo Nordisk, finding the district court did not abuse its discretion in excluding plaintiff's expert testimony under Daubert standards, which was the only evidence supporting plaintiffs' general causation theory in their failure-to-warn claim.

Browse more:Failure to Accommodate cases

D.C. CircuitJul 1997

Remanded

Shelley Savage v. Glendale Union High School, District No. 205, Maricopa County

9th CircuitSep 2003

Plaintiff Win

James Chappel v. Laboratory Corporation of America, AKA National Health Lab

9th CircuitNov 2000

Mixed Result

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Ford Motor Co.

6th CircuitApr 2015

Defendant Win

Keith Curtis v. Costco Wholesale Corporation

7th CircuitNov 2015

Defendant Win

Read Full Opinion More Novo Nordisk A/S Rulings All Rulings

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

Check My Rights Learn the Basics

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.