Skip to main content

Adam J. Rothberg v. Fridrich & Associates Insurance Agency, Inc.

Tenn. Ct. App.June 17, 2022No. M2022-00795-COA-T10B-CV
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Judge Arnold B. Goldin
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
Appeal dismissed on procedural grounds

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

Appellant's expedited appeal was dismissed for failure to comply with Tennessee Supreme Court Rule 10B requirements.

Excerpt

This is an expedited appeal pursuant to Tennessee Supreme Court Rule 10B. Based on the Appellant's failure to comply with the requirements of Rule 10B, we dismiss the appeal.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened** Adam Rothberg had an employment dispute with his former employer, Fridrich & Associates Insurance Agency. After losing his case in a lower court, Rothberg tried to appeal the decision using Tennessee's expedited appeal process, which is designed to speed up certain types of appeals. **What the Court Decided** The Tennessee Court of Appeals dismissed Rothberg's appeal entirely. The court didn't rule on the actual employment dispute. Instead, they threw out the case because Rothberg failed to follow the specific rules required for expedited appeals under Tennessee Supreme Court Rule 10B. When using the fast-track appeal process, there are strict procedural requirements that must be met exactly. **Why This Matters for Workers** This case serves as an important reminder that following court procedures correctly is just as crucial as having a strong legal case. Workers who want to appeal employment decisions must carefully follow all filing requirements and deadlines. Missing procedural steps—even seemingly minor ones—can result in losing the right to appeal entirely, regardless of how valid the underlying employment complaint might be. Workers considering appeals should ensure they understand and comply with all court rules or risk having their cases dismissed.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

More Rulings in This Case

Other orders and opinions in Adam J. Rothberg v. Fridrich & Associates Insurance Agency, Inc. from the same court.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.