Skip to main content

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Grisham Farm Products, Inc.

W.D. Mo.June 8, 2016No. Case No. 6:16-cv-03105-MDHCited 4 times
Plaintiff WinGrisham Farm Products, Inc.$10,000 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Harpool
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
motion to dismiss

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Failure to AccommodateDiscrimination

Outcome

The EEOC prevailed on all three counts against Grisham Farm Products for requiring discriminatory pre-offer health history forms that violated the ADA and GINA, and for failing to retain employment records. The court awarded $10,000 in damages to the affected applicant, Philip Sullivan.

What This Ruling Means

Court Rules Against Grisham Farm Products for Discriminatory Hiring Practices

What Happened

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission sued Grisham Farm Products after the company required job applicants to provide detailed health history information before offering them positions. This practice violated two federal laws designed to protect workers: the Americans with Disabilities Act (which prevents discrimination based on disability) and the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (which protects people from being treated differently based on family medical history). Additionally, the company failed to keep proper employment records as required by law.

What the Court Decided

The court sided completely with the EEOC. Grisham Farm Products was ordered to pay $10,000 in damages to Philip Sullivan, the affected job applicant, for the company's violations.

Why This Matters for Workers

This case reinforces that employers cannot ask about health history or disabilities before making a job offer. Companies must also maintain accurate employment records. Workers applying for jobs have the right to privacy about their medical information and cannot be denied employment based on health conditions or family medical history.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.