Skip to main content

Michael P. Moore v. California Institute of Technology Jet Propulsion Laboratory

9th CircuitJanuary 4, 2002No. 00-55958Cited 88 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Pregerson, Reinhardt, Silverman
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

RetaliationWhistleblower

Outcome

The Ninth Circuit reversed the district court's grant of summary judgment, finding that Moore engaged in protected whistleblowing activity under the False Claims Act and Major Fraud Act, and that JPL's proposed job transfer and reorganization constituted actionable retaliation.

What This Ruling Means

**Moore v. California Institute of Technology Jet Propulsion Laboratory** This case involved Michael P. Moore, who brought an employment-related lawsuit against the California Institute of Technology's Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL). Moore filed his case in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in January 2002, claiming workplace violations under employment law. The specific details of Moore's complaint and the court's final decision are not available from the provided information. The case outcome and any potential damages awarded remain unknown based on the limited court record excerpt. **Why This Matters for Workers:** Even without knowing the specific outcome, this case demonstrates that employees can challenge major research institutions and government contractors like JPL in federal court when they believe their employment rights have been violated. The fact that Moore's case reached the appeals court level shows that workers have legal pathways to pursue claims against powerful employers, including those involved in government research and aerospace work. This reinforces that employment law protections extend to all types of workplaces, from private companies to prestigious research facilities, and that workers can seek justice through the court system when they face workplace violations.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.