Skip to main content

Oregon Bureau of Labor and Industries, Ex Rel. Darryl Richardson v. U.S. West Communications, Inc., a Colorado Corporation

9th CircuitApril 26, 2002No. 01-35247Cited 33 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Brunetti, Leavy, Nelson
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Retaliation

Outcome

The Ninth Circuit reversed the district court's denial of BOLI's motion to remand, holding that 28 U.S.C. § 1441(a) authorizes removal only from state courts, and BOLI is an administrative agency, not a court. The case was remanded back to BOLI.

What This Ruling Means

**What This Employment Case Was About** This case involved Darryl Richardson and his dispute with U.S. West Communications, a telecommunications company. The Oregon Bureau of Labor and Industries represented Richardson in the legal proceedings. While the specific details of Richardson's workplace complaint aren't provided in the available information, the case dealt with employment law issues between the worker and his employer. **What the Court Decided** The outcome of this case from the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals is not specified in the available records. The case was filed in April 2002, but the final decision and any damages awarded are not documented in the summary provided. **What This Means for Workers** Without knowing the specific outcome, workers should understand that this case demonstrates how state labor agencies can step in to help employees fight workplace violations. The Oregon Bureau of Labor and Industries acted on Richardson's behalf, showing that workers aren't always alone when facing employment disputes with large corporations. Workers facing similar issues should know they can often seek help from their state's labor department, which may investigate and even represent them in court proceedings against employers.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Retaliation cases

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.