Skip to main content

Union Planters National Bank v. East Central Arkansas Economic Development Corp.

Ark.March 30, 2000No. 99-573Cited 4 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Thornton
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The Arkansas Supreme Court affirmed the chancery court's decision to appoint a receiver for the nonprofit corporation's dissolution and liquidation, rejecting the bank's challenge to the court's jurisdiction and the propriety of the receivership appointment.

What This Ruling Means

# Court Ruling Summary: Union Planters National Bank v. East Central Arkansas Economic Development Corp. ## What Happened A bank challenged a court's decision to appoint a receiver to oversee the dissolution and liquidation of a nonprofit economic development corporation. The bank questioned whether the court had the authority to make this decision and whether appointing a receiver was appropriate. ## What the Court Decided Arkansas's highest court sided with the lower court. The court confirmed it had proper authority over the case and upheld the appointment of a receiver to manage the nonprofit's shutdown and asset distribution. ## Why This Matters for Workers While this case primarily involved corporate finance and nonprofit dissolution, it clarifies court powers to oversee business closures. Workers should understand that when companies or nonprofits shut down, courts can appoint receivers to ensure proper handling of assets and obligations—potentially protecting unpaid wages or benefits workers are owed during the closure process.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.