Skip to main content

National Labor Relations Board v. Calvert

S.D. Ind.March 31, 2017No. No. 1:16-cv-00161-SEB-MJD
Defendant WinELC Electric Inc.
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Barker
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal
State
Indiana

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

DiscriminationRetaliationWrongful Termination

Outcome

The district court affirmed the bankruptcy court's decision that Calvert's debt to the NLRB for backpay was dischargeable in bankruptcy, holding that the NLRB failed to prove by a preponderance of evidence that Calvert acted with the requisite malice under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(6).

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened** This case involved a dispute over whether an employer had to pay back wages to workers after filing for bankruptcy. The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) had previously ordered a company called ELC Electric Inc. and its owner Calvert to pay back wages to employees who were allegedly fired or mistreated for workplace organizing activities. However, Calvert later filed for bankruptcy and argued that this debt should be wiped out along with other debts. **What the Court Decided** The court ruled in favor of Calvert, allowing the back pay debt to be eliminated through bankruptcy. The court found that the NLRB could not prove that Calvert acted with sufficient malice or intentional wrongdoing when the company violated workers' rights. Under bankruptcy law, debts can only be preserved if they resulted from willful and malicious conduct. **Why This Matters for Workers** This ruling is concerning for workers because it shows that employers may be able to escape paying court-ordered compensation to wrongfully terminated employees by filing for bankruptcy. Even when workers win cases proving illegal retaliation or discrimination, they might not receive the money they're owed if the employer can successfully argue their actions weren't malicious enough.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.