No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Defendant PSEG prevailed on summary judgment on all claims. The court affirmed that plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie ADA case because he was not 'otherwise qualified' for the boiler operator position due to unreliable attendance caused by alcoholism, and that PSEG's termination was for repeated 'no call/no show' policy violations, not FMLA-protected leave.
VandenBroek v. PSEG Power Connecticut LLC
What Happened
An employee at PSEG Power Connecticut claimed he was fired because of a disability and retaliation for taking protected medical leave. He worked as a boiler operator but had frequent unexcused absences from work related to alcoholism.
What the Court Decided
The court sided with the employer. The judge found that the employee could not do the job reliably because of his attendance problems, which made him unable to perform the essential duties of a boiler operator. The court concluded PSEG fired him for violating the company's "no call/no show" attendance policy, not because of his disability or his use of family medical leave.
Why This Matters for Workers
This case shows that disability protections have limits. While employers must make reasonable accommodations for workers with disabilities, they are not required to keep employees who cannot perform core job duties reliably. However, workers should know they still have protections—employers cannot use attendance problems as a cover for disability discrimination. If you face termination, consider whether the real reason is your disability rather than genuine performance issues.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Other orders and opinions in VandenBroek v. PSEG Power Ct LLC from the same court.
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.