Skip to main content

Marshall v. District of Columbia Water & Sewage Authority

D.D.C.March 18, 2003No. No. CIV.A.01-01915(HHK/JMF)Cited 7 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Facciola
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
motion to dismiss

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Discrimination

Outcome

Court granted plaintiff's motion to compel in part and denied in part. The magistrate judge ordered defendant WASA to produce additional discovery materials including best qualified lists, EEO investigation documents, performance evaluations, and personnel files, while sustaining certain objections regarding age and sex information as not relevant to the race discrimination claim. No sanctions were imposed.

What This Ruling Means

**Marshall v. District of Columbia Water & Sewage Authority: Discovery Ruling** This case involved a worker who sued the D.C. Water and Sewage Authority claiming race discrimination. During the lawsuit, the employee asked the court to force the employer to hand over important workplace documents that could support their discrimination claim. The court issued a mixed ruling on what documents the employer had to provide. The judge ordered the water authority to turn over several key items including lists of the "best qualified" candidates for positions, records from internal discrimination investigations, employee performance reviews, and personnel files. However, the court protected the employer from having to share information about workers' ages and gender, ruling that this information wasn't relevant to a case specifically about race discrimination. This ruling matters for workers because it shows that courts will help employees get access to important workplace documents during discrimination lawsuits. When employers try to hide records that could prove unfair treatment, workers can ask judges to force them to share this information. The decision demonstrates that while courts will order employers to provide relevant documents, they'll also limit requests to information that's actually connected to the specific type of discrimination being claimed.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.